AB 357 (Dead)

AB 248 (Passed Assembly 32-10)

Bob Beers' Letter to the Assembly

Sample Letter to Legislators

Pascal's Letter to Legislators

 

 

Senator Raggio moved that Standing Rule 50 be suspended which requires a one-day notice to withdraw Assembly Bill No. 248 from the Committee on Judiciary. 

Remarks by Senator Raggio.

Motion carried.

Senator Raggio moved that Assembly Bill No. 248 be withdrawn from the Committee on Judiciary and rereferred to the Committee on Commerce and Labor.

Remarks by Senator Raggio and Care.

Senator Care requested that his remarks be entered in the Journal.

Thank you, Mr. President. I rise in opposition to the motion. This bill falls under the purview of chapter 463, which is gaming. It was introduced on April 25 and now it is May 1. It is scheduled for a hearing this Friday. I am not going to talk about the merits of the bill, but it is highly unusual to see a bill like this rereferred from committee where it has been resting for six days and is already scheduled for a hearing. This is the reason for my opposition. I am talking about procedure.

The first time I concentrated on this bill was last Friday when a lobbyist came to see me. I asked this person a number of questions. I took the opportunity to review the labor commissioner's written opinion, Judge Herndon's written order, denying and granting motions in summary judgment on both sides, and I read the relevant case law. This bill has big problems. In light of existing case law, I have doubts about the viability of this bill. But, I would like to talk about process. Like you, I have received hundreds of e-mails from constituents for and against, in industry and out of the industry, on this bill. I was prepared for this hearing. I have a number of questions I want to ask. I think it is part of the process, part of the deliberations that elected representatives are supposed to go through. I know that this motion will be approved. The bill will go to Commerce and Labor, but I have been telling my constituents since Friday that since I sit on the committee where the bill was assigned I will take testimony and I will listen and I will be in touch with them. It does not look as if I will have the opportunity to do so. What I would like to do at this point is to be able to tell my constituents that there will be a hearing on this bill in Commerce and Labor and that they will have the opportunity to testify on it whether they are for it or against it. I am not going to testify on the bill. I have not given it any thought, but I am wondering if I can give my constituents the commitment that this bill will have a hearing in Commerce and Labor.

Motion carried.